Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service.
Police in south Wales are probing allegations that steelworkers at Port Talbot were victims of pension fraud.
The complaints, lodged by members of the British Steel Pension Scheme, came as a regulatory review found only half of pension transfers made by steelworkers at the Tata UK plant were suitable.
They include allegations that some members were deceived and misled by financial advisers into investing six-figure pension pots into unsuitable and high-charging funds.
The Financial Conduct Authority is already probing concerns that pension changes affecting around 130,000 members of the Tata retirement fund appeared to have led to a “feeding frenzy” for rogue advisers.
As part of a deal struck last year to keep Tata UK afloat, members belonging to the £15bn British Steel pension fund were given the option to shift their assured benefits to the Pension Protection Fund, join a new retirement scheme backed by Tata, or transfer to personal pension funds.
Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service.
“South Wales Police is aware of recent media reports surrounding a pension scheme concerning steel workers at Port Talbot and is currently reviewing certain information that has been brought to our attention,” the force said in a statement to the Financial Times.
Police did not disclose how many complaints had been lodged by steelworkers or how many advisers were the subject of complaints.
“It would be inappropriate to comment further at this time,” said South Wales police.
The FCA also disclosed that only half of the steelworker pension transfers it had reviewed recently had been suitable for the individuals involved.
Of the 129 cases reviewed, taken from across 21 advisers, 33 per cent were deemed unsuitable. In 16 per cent of cases, it was unclear to the regulator whether the advice was suitable.
The FCA considers an “unclear” rating to be a breach of its rules as the firm has not taken reasonable steps to ensure the personal recommendation was suitable for the customer.
“We are contacting these firms to set out our concerns; however, of the 21 firms, we have seen no evidence of funds being invested in scams,” said Andrew Bailey, chief executive of the FCA, in a letter to the Commons work and pensions committee, released on Thursday.
Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
https://www.ft.com/content/46ef41b4-fba3-11e7-a492-2c9be7f3120a
The development came a week after the FCA revealed that eight independent financial advisers had had their pension transfer advice activities restricted following concerns about the suitability of their advice to steelworkers.
“Our work on BSPS is not finished, and we are continuing to take action where we have concerns,” said the FCA.
The FCA said its work so far had accounted for 1,766 BSPS transfer cases, or around 90 per cent of all BSPS transfers to date.
Alastair Rush, of Echelon Wealthcare, a Rutland-based IFA, said advisers should make their clients aware of charges on investments recommended for their pension fund and ensure they were suitable for their risk profile.
But Mr Rush said this had not been the case with the transfers he had reviewed.
“Not only should they not have transferred out, but the funds are highly unsuitable and chronically expensive,” said Mr Rush.
“There are lock-in clauses which result in them losing 5 per cent of their fund value should they transfer out. I have spoken with between 50 and 60 steel workers who stand to lose 5 per cent of their fund size (average £350,000), or be exposed to cost approaching 10 per cent of their fund sizes each year”.
Mr Rush claims that 150-250 BSPS members, each with between £300,000 and £700,000 in pension cash to invest, may have fallen victim to a rogue adviser.
